Kite v. Gus Kaplan, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney · Garcia v. St. Bernard Parish School Bd. · 607 So. 2d 865 - Bond v. Broadway · Bond v. Broadway · 665 So. 2d 1186 - New Orleans Hat Attack, Inc. v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to have the benefit of the corporate veil, Kaplan [the corporate officer] must have acted with a `proper motive' to be granted the protection of the privilege which encompasses the scope of his intent to act in the best interest of the corporation at the time of the unlawful eviction. If Kaplan's motive was malicious in breaching the lease with Kite, then his actions were without `justification' and the final element of proof to hold Kaplan personally responsible for the breach of the lease will have been met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“.... . . . COVERAGE B. PERSONAL AND ADVERTISING INJURY LIABILITY 1. Insuring Agreement. a. We will pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All of the mentioned store space, and reserve stock space is located in the store of lessor, and may be changed from time to time by lessor at its option and expense. [3]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.