708 So. 2d 540 - Keyes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Keyes argues that he has already been punished for felony DUI by suspension of his license for one year, and that the State is precluded from further prosecution. Even assuming that ALS [administrative license suspension pursuant to § 63-11-23(2) ] is sufficiently punitive to invite a double jeopardy analysis, we conclude that it requires different elements than conviction under § 63-11-30 and thus does not preclude subsequent prosecution under that section.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Miles v. City of Gulfport

2. “that the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and Mississippi Constitutions do not preclude criminal prosecution for violation of Miss.Code Ann. § 63-11-30 subsequent to administrative license suspension pursuant to § 63-11-23(2).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 740 So. 2d 952 - Holmes v. State

3. “inquires whether each offense contains an element not contained in the other; if not, they are the `same offence' [sic] and double jeopardy bars additional punishment and successive prosecution.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Powell v. State