Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 So. 2d 661 - State v. Meyers

708 So. 2d 661 - State v. Meyers’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 698 So. 2d 831 - State v. Hudson · Zuckerman v. Alter · London v. State · 285 So. 2d 687 - Fixel v. Clevenger · 426 So. 2d 1100 - City of Miami v. Save Brickell Ave., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he statute calls for the trial court to impose sentence as a violent career criminal unless `the court finds ... that it is not necessary for the protection of the public...'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To clarify, when the state attorney pursues a violent career criminal sanction against a defendant, the trial court has two choices: it can Gortize the defendant and sentence him in compliance with the mandatory minimum provision of the statute, or it can determine that a violent career criminal classification is not necessary for the protection of the public and not be bound by the mandatory provision of the section. The statute is drawn in such a way that the trial judge need only find that the defendant is not a danger to the community when the judge decides to sentence the defendant outside the mandatory sentencing provision of this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.