Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SO2D 764 - State v. Batiste

State v. Batiste’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably 750 So. 2d 1036 - State v. Hotoph (1999), 735 So. 2d 62 - State v. Williams (1999)

28 state decisions

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Sullivan v. Louisiana · State v. Oliveaux · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A homicide is justifiable: (1) When committed in self-defense by one who reasonably believes that he is in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that the killing is necessary to save himself from that danger.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “La.C.E. art. 103(A) states that error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence, unless a substantial right of the party is affected. Sec. A(2) of the same article provides that error may not be predicated upon a ruling excluding evidence unless the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by counsel. In criminal cases, as well as civil cases, a party has a legal right, when evidence has been excluded, to make an offer of proof of what counsel expects to prove, outside of the presence of the jury. (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A. Second degree murder is the killing of a human being. (1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm; ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.