Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SO2D 784 - Genusa v. Dominique

Genusa v. Dominique’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2017

13 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · 550 So. 2d 577 - Penalber v. Blount · 599 So. 2d 1058 - Cole v. Celotex Corp. · 685 So. 2d 691 - Hayes v. Autin · Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “C. (1) After adequate discovery or after a case is set for trial, a motion which shows that there is no genuine issue as to material fact and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law shall be granted. (2) The burden of proof remains with the movant. However, if the movant will not bear the burden of proof at trial on the matter that is before the court on the motion for summary judgment, the movant’s burden on the motion does not require him to negate all essential elements of the adverse party’s claim, action, or defense, but rather to point out to the court that there is an absence of factual support for one or more elements essential to the adverse party’s claim, action, or defense. Thereafter, if the adverse party fails to produce factual support sufficient to establish that he will be able to satisfy his evidentiary burden of proof at trial, there is no genuine issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.