Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SO2D 822 - Carriere v. State

Carriere v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2018

7 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE · 692 So. 2d 524 - Haywood v. Louisiana Sugar Cane Products · Johnsey v. McCalla · 664 So. 2d 572 - McCoy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a motion for summary judgment shall be granted if the motion, memorandum, and supporting documents show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]ssues of credibility have no place in summary judgment procedure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.