Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SO2D 983 - Segall v. Segall

Segall v. Segall’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 839 So. 2d 867 - Ondrejack v. Ondrejack (2003), 973 So. 2d 580 - Roth v. Roth (2008)

44 state decisions

240199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 680 So. 2d 413 - Bonifay v. State · 439 So. 2d 887 - Conner v. Conner · 565 So. 2d 820 - Gentile v. Gentile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the absence of explicit factual findings concerning the actual incomes attributable to the Husband and the Wife, the amount and source of any imputed income, the probable and potential earnings level, and the adjustments to income, the trial court's final judgment was deficient.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n the absence of sufficient factual findings concerning the statutory factors [and consideration of those factors by the trial court] it is impossible for this court to assess the reasonableness of the permanent alimony award.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]n determining whether to award permanent periodic alimony, the trial court must consider the needs of the spouse requesting the alimony and the ability of the other spouse to make alimony payments.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.