Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SW2D 104 - Wells v. Beth-Elkhorn Coal Corp.

Wells v. Beth-Elkhorn Coal Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth, Department of Mental Health v. Robertson · Beth-Elkhorn Corporation v. Nash · Kind v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... (T)he statute is to be liberally construed and is not intended merely to address clerical errors but all patent errors .... The Board is limited in its granting of the petition in one respect, however. The petition may not be granted if it appears that the Board has reconsidered the case on its merits and/or changed its factual findings_ (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.