Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SW2D 270 - State v. Barnes

State v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2003

6 state decisions

30198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hunter · State v. Moland · State v. Hills · State v. Stevenson · State v. Barmann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “NOTE: Any variation in ascribing the elements of an offense to the defendant or to the other person or persons and any variation in the selection of alternatives in the paragraph following “then you are instructed that the offense of [name of offense] has occurred....” shall not be deemed reversible error in the absence of prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.