State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 1996
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Howard · Bailey v. Butcher · 37 Cal. 3d 351 - People v. McDonald · State v. Chapple · United States v. Downing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A lineup is not impermissibly suggestive merely because the individuals composing the lineup have dissimilar physical appearances. A reasonable effort to find physically similar participants is normally all that is required. Differences in age, weight, height, hairstyle and other physical characteristics do not, therefore, compel a finding of impermissible suggestiveness. State v. Cooper, 708 S.W.2d 299, 305 (Mo.App.1986) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roberts
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.