Homan v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably State Ex Rel. Curry v. Gray (1987), United States v. Strickland (2010)
1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Barrett v. United States · Rinaldi v. Yeager
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) On violation of a condition of probation imposed under Subsection (a) of this section, the defendant may be arrested and detained as provided in Section 24 of this Article. The defendant is entitled to a hearing limited to the determination by the court of whether it proceeds with an adjudication of guilt on the original charge. No appeal may be taken from this determination. After an adjudication of guilt, all proceedings, including assessment of punishment, pronouncement of sentence, granting of probation, and defendant’s appeal continue as if the adjudication of guilt had not been deferred.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Price v. State · Byrd v. State“The defendant ... pled guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery.... The defendant signed his plea papers ... reflecting his plea was to aggravated robbery. For some reason, when I prepared the judgment and sentence in this case, I incorrectly showed the defendant pled to a reduced charge of robbery.... Subsequently, I discovered the mistake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Based upon the facts of this case, the trial court did not err, except in the “ex parte” nature of his action, in correcting the original order deferring adjudication of guilt to reflect the proper offense for which applicant’s guilt was deferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dees v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.