Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SW2D 484 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 194th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Hudson v. Louisiana · Dues v. State · Alvarado v. State · Beggs v. State · English v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “trial court granted appellant's motion without having authority to consider the motion [for new trial].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Texas Rules of Post Trial and Criminal Appellate Procedure”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.