Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 708 SW2D 741 - State v. Danneman

State v. Danneman’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2011

7 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kercheval v. United States · State v. Meyers · State v. Hoopes · State v. Johnson · State v. Crews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence of a plea of guilty, later withdrawn, ... is not admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding against the person who made the plea or offer....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[the use of the withdrawn plea of guilty, and statements made in connection with it, constitutes reversible error....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.