Mayo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2014
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · Gordon v. United States · Williams v. Texas · O'BRYAN v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Article 36.22, V.A.C.C.P., states that: No person shall be permitted to be with a jury while it is deliberating. No person shall be permitted to converse with a juror about the case on trial except in the presence and by the permission of the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Horst v. State · Green v. State“where a juror has conversed with any person in regard to the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Alexander v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.