State v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2016
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Ornelas v. United States · Colorado v. Connelly · Miller v. Fenton · Frazier v. Cupp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant argued * * * that he was so incapacitated by his ingestion of drugs and alcohol that he could not voluntarily waive his rights even though he understood them.”). In other words, even though trial counsel decided that that defense would be unavailing at trial, he was not reluctant to make reference to same as part of his motion to suppress — a motion which the hearing justice described as being the one”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Page v. State“proof of intoxication alone, absent a showing of coercive police activity, is not sufficient to suppress a confession.” State v. Page, 709 A.2d 1042, 1045 (R.I.1998) (quoting Brown v. Moran, 534 A.2d 180, 183 (R.I.1987)); see also Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mlyniec“a Rule 35 [of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure] motion determination is a prerequisite to an appeal to this court as to the propriety of a sentence;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Page v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.