Tyars v. Finner’s Empirical Analysis
709 F.2d 1274 · 1983
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Duckett v. Godinez (1995), Sample v. Johnson (1985)
42 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Mathews v. Eldridge · Warth v. Seldin · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wolff v. McDonnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be limited to cases urgently demanding that action,”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“at least some prior showing of necessity”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“'constant reminder of the accused's condition implicit in such distinctive, identifiable [restraints]' surely could have had a significant, deleterious effect on the jury's judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.