Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 F.2d 139 - Charry v. Hall

Charry v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

709 F.2d 139 · 1983

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2012

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Bell v. Hood · Hagans v. Lavine · Greene v. Massey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to take an examination is hardly the equivalent of the grant of the license for which it is taken... .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The possible occurrence of an error in one or two cases does not call for an expansion of the review system to add cumbersome and expensive evidentiary hearings with detailed findings, at least when the only property at stake is the right to sit for an examination. To do so would heap an excessive burden on the slate in cases in which applications are denied. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth does not guarantee errorless administrative decisions. It assures only a procedure that is reasonably calculated to protect a person’s property right. The review procedure here met that standard. Id. at 146 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In the present case the private interest, i.e., the fight to take an examination, while important enough to be classified as a constitutionally protectible property interest, hardly approximates the importance of a vested property right such as a license itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.