Lionti v. Lloyd's Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
709 F.2d 237 · 1983
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2005
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2111
Relies on Hoffman v. United States · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Grunewald v. United States · Ullmann v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'general rule that if evidence which may have been taken in the course of a trial, be withdrawn from the consideration of the jury by the direction of the presiding judge, that such direction cures any error which may have been committed by its introduction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n light ... of the overwhelming evidence adduced during trial, we are satisfied that Miller's statement, while erroneously admitted, was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“wrap the case up for the insurance company and [that] the Liontis were not dumb and they would be willing to make a deal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.