Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 F.2d 388 - United States v. Bird

United States v. Bird’s Empirical Analysis

709 F.2d 388 · 1983

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021 · most notably United States v. Mechanik (1986), United States v. Abbamonte (1985)

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

15019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Catlin v. United States · Abney v. United States · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Cobbledick v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the agreement is phrased in terms of nonprosecution, its essence is a promise of immunity. [The defendant's] immunity from punishment will not be lost simply because she is forced to stand trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is value--to all but the most unusual litigant--in triumphing before trial, rather than after it ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “immunity from punishment will not be lost simply because [the defendant] is forced to stand trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.