Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 F.2d 452 - Texaco, Inc. v. Cottage Hill Operating Co.

Texaco, Inc. v. Cottage Hill Operating Co.’s Empirical Analysis

709 F.2d 452 · 1983

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Meachum v. Fano · Enelow v. New York Life Insurance · Boesche v. Udall · Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “5 See Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 , 236, 65 S.Ct. 631, 635, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. John Burns Drilling Co v. Central Bank of Denver Central Bank of Denver · Goetz v. Cappelen
  2. “The denial of a motion to dismiss, even when the motion is based on jurisdictional grounds, ... is interlocutory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. John Burns Drilling Co v. Central Bank of Denver Central Bank of Denver

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.