Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

709 F.2d 7

Docket No. 82-2066.

Dobson v. Camden

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-06-20

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2006

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Dobson v. Camden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-06-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

D. Reid Walker, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Lovell W. Aldrich, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; John V. Singleton, Judge.

SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 26, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983, 705 F.2d 759)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GOLDBERG, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/709/f2d/7 · .json · Public domain