Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 F.2d 800 - Maggette v. Dalsheim

Maggette v. Dalsheim’s Empirical Analysis

709 F.2d 800 · 1983

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Morgan v. Church's Fried Chicken (1987), Meade v. Grubbs (1988)

30 federal appellate · 5 district ·

4101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Hughes v. Rowe · Cruz v. Beto · Brower v. United States · Lewis v. Faulkner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a severe sanction, 'applicable only in the extreme circumstances' ... [and] should be used as 'a weapon of last, rather than first, resort.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, it has been consistently held that when pleadings are themselves sufficient to withstand dismissal, failure to respond to a 12(b)(6) motion cannot constitute a 'default' justifying dismissal of the complaint;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is entitled to notice of the consequences of failing to respond to a motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings which is being treated as a motion for summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.