Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 F.3d 1318 - Amponsah v. Holder

Amponsah v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

709 F.3d 1318 · 2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Barron v. Ashcroft · Barnhart Commissioner of Social Security v. Walton · De Sylva v. Ballentine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “little or no weight to the federal policy of keeping families together, fails to afford deference to valid state court judgments in an area of the law-domestic relations-that is primarily a matter of state concern and addresses the possibility of immigration fraud through a sweeping, blanket rule rather than considering the validity of nunc pro tunc adoption decrees on a case-by-case basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he act of adoption must occur before the child attains the age [specified in the Immigration and Nationality Act].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “blanket rule against recognizing state courts' nunc pro tunc adoption decrees”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.