United States v. Gamble’s Empirical Analysis
709 F.3d 541 · 2013
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2254 · 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (§ 40113 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 28 U.S.C. § 2106
Relies on Morissette v. United States · New York v. Ferber · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Kelly v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each individual defendant is not necessary to cause the aggregate harm — it would have happened without him.”); Laraneta, 700 F.3d at 992 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“As a logical matter, a defendant generally cannot cause harm prior to the date of his offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“national disparities, not specific individual cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.