Albino v. Baca

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 2013.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2013-03-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2014

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-03-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Juan Roberto Albino, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

¶2Andrea Renee St. Julian, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶3Catherine Mason Mathers, Collins Collins Muir & Stewart LLP, South Pasadena, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

¶4ORDER

¶5KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

¶6Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and *995Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.