David Engstrom v. Doc Holladay

¶1 David Engstrom appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, which alleged that his constitutional rights were violated in pretrial detention after another detainee signed him up to fast during Ramadan. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no error warranting reversal, See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.