Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 FSUPP 1209 - Giano v. Sullivan

Giano v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2005

1 district · 1 state decisions

70198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Wolff v. McDonnell · Townsend v. Sain · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Tumey v. State of Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he inmate facing disciplinary proceedings should be allowed to call witnesses and present documentary evidence in his defense when permitting him to do so will not be unduly hazardous to institutional safety or correctional goals. Ordinarily, the right to present evidence is basic to a fair hearing. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unconstitutionally denied his right to marshal evidence and present a defense to the disciplinary charges against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We decline to apply harmless error analysis to the constitutional defects in petitioner's disciplinary hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.