De Allende v. Shultz’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 2691 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Pierce v. Underwood · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“position of the United States was substantially justified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. De Allende v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.