United States v. Mallory’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · White v. Illinois · United States v. Ellis · United States v. Adefehinti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he FedEx custodian's certification in this case does not comment on the content or meaning of the record .... [and] does not attempt to describe or decipher the content of the business record”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jasper · State v. Jasper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.