Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 N.E.2d 323 - Freije v. State

Freije v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably In re G.B. (1999), Smith v. State (2002)

26 state decisions

140199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. State · Reinbold v. State · State ex rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior Court, Criminal Division No. 1 · Disney v. State · State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3. The Defendant shall receive sentence [sic] of 2190 days at the Indiana Department of Correction with 2188 days suspended and credit for 1 day actually served and the balance of the time to be suspended. 4. The Defendant shall be placed on probation for a period of 2188 days of which the first 365 days must be monitored by the Hendricks County Superior Courts Probation department. Thereafter, the Defendant may petition the Court to request a transfer of the probation to another county.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the court accepts a plea agreement, it shall be bound by its terms.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “administrative or ministerial conditions[,]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.