Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Allen · The Everglades Cypress Co. v. Tyner · French v. State · Shultz v. State · Peters v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the Sheriff does not control the courtroom. That is the responsibility of the trial judge. The trial judge is bound to proceed in accordance with the terms of 22 0.8.1981 § 15 until some reason develops to proceed otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was apparently shackled [at trial] at the direction of the County Sheriff, and no basis for that decision is found in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if defendant engages in misconduct so disruptive and disrespectful that the trial cannot continue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.