State v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Rivas v. United States (2001), State v. Ashcraft (2015)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · Kugler v. Helfant · Dioguardi v. United States · United States v. James · United States v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficient nexus between the accused and the [contraband] to permit an inference that the accused had both the power and the intent to exercise dominion and control over the [contraband].”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Layman · State v. Workman“'depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“(1) that defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed a controlled substance, and (2) that defendant intended to distribute the controlled substance to another.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Layman · State v. Briggs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.