Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 P2D 39 - Frontier Exploration, Inc. v. Blocker Exploration Co.

Frontier Exploration, Inc. v. Blocker Exploration Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp. · Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission · Ayco Development Corp. v. G. E. T. Service Co. · Nahring v. City and County of Denver · Shell Oil Co. v. Prestidge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ne who contracts voluntarily for the right of involvement or participation in the control or management of a mining venture should be liable for the debts of the partnership, whether that right is exercised or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Blocker Exploration Co. v. Frontier Exploration, Inc.
  2. “the determining factor is related to the degree of active participation in control or management of the venture that is exercised by a co-tenant or co-owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Blocker Exploration Co. v. Frontier Exploration, Inc.
  3. “undertake a detailed seismic investigation to establish drilling prospects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Blocker Exploration Co. v. Frontier Exploration, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.