Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 SO2D 1257 - Gibert v. Gibert

Gibert v. Gibert’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 406 So. 2d 988 - Liberty Loan Corp. of Gadsden v. Williams · 624 So. 2d 1076 - Greer v. Greer · 352 So. 2d 454 - English v. English · Perkins v. Perkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Without a transcript of the hearing on the wife's motion to modify the divorce judgment, there is no way for this court to determine whether the wife's arguments have probable merit. We cannot put the trial court in error without knowing what issues were litigated and resolved at the hearing and what the factual basis for the court's judgment was. "As the appellant, the wife has the duty of seeing that any error asserted on appeal is affirmatively demonstrated by the record. See Perkins v. Perkins , 465 So.2d 414 (Ala. Civ. App. 1984). If the record does not disclose the facts upon which the asserted error is based, the error may not be considered on appeal. Liberty Loan Corp. of Gadsden v. Williams , 406 So.2d 988 (Ala. Civ. App. 1981). Evidence presented to the trial court but not preserved in the record on appeal is conclusively presumed to support the trial court's judgment. English v. English , 352 So.2d 454 (Ala. Civ. App. 1977). See generally Greer v. Greer , 624 So.2d 1076 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). I would affirm the trial court's denial, without a hearing, of the wife's post-judgment motion."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.