¶1Reversed. See Vazquez v. State, 700 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), rev. granted, 705 So.2d 902 (Fla.1998). As we said in Vazquez, the standard jury instruction on entrapment does not comport with the dictates of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). That was the jury instruction given in this case and, as we did in Vazquez, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
709 So. 2d 130
Henkel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 11, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-03-11
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1998
1 state decisions
Relies on 629 So. 2d 90 - Munoz v. State · 705 So. 2d 898 - Florida Board of Bar Examiners Re Massachusetts School of Law · 700 So. 2d 5 - Vazquez v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-03-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →