Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

709 So. 2d 1317

State v. Grantland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1998

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1998-01-23

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2003

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Cannon

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-01-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We quash the writ as having been improvidently granted. In doing so, we do not wish to be understood as suggesting that the State should be permitted to use the writ of mandamus as a substitute for an appeal in a case where an appeal is not permitted. Ex parte Cannon, 369 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1978).

¶2WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, KENNEDY, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.
/709/so2d/1317 · .json · Public domain