709 So. 2d 311 - State v. Tran’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

cited by 33 later decisions

states following

February 2017

most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably State v. Wooten (1999), 924 So. 2d 345 - State v. Paul (2006)

33 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“The purpose of an expert witness, particularly in criminal cases, is to provide jurors with a basic knowledge and background on a subject, while the jury retains its ultimate role as fact finder. The jurors relate background knowledge from the expert to facts established by the evidence and make a determination as to defendant's guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 759 So. 2d 980 - State v. Stokes · 904 So. 2d 838 - State v. Becnel
“In order to convict an accused of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, the state must prove, (1) there was an unauthorized entry; (2) the structure was inhabited at the time of entry; and (3) defendant had the specific intent to commit a felony or theft inside the structure. To satisfy the unauthorized entry element, the state must prove that the defendant did not have permission to enter the premises. Id. 97-640, 709 So.2d at 316-317 (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 767 So. 2d 811 - State v. Roussel
“Recent jurisprudence supports the imposition of the maximum sentence under this statute where the defendant's criminal record is extensive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Chess

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.