Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 So. 2d 339 - State v. Scott

709 So. 2d 339 - State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2013

14 state decisions

100199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Anders v. California · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · 573 So. 2d 528 - State v. Benjamin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] failure to arraign the defendant or the fact that he did not plead, is waived if the defendant enters upon the trial without objecting thereto, and it shall be considered as if he had pleaded not guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm; or (2)(a) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of aggravated rape, forcible rape, aggravated arson, aggravated burglary, aggravated kidnapping, second degree kidnapping, aggravated escape, drive-by shooting, armed robbery, first degree robbery, or simple robbery, even though he has no intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.