Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 709 SO2D 447 - Ex Parte Dyess

Ex Parte Dyess’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
6
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Eichold v. Easter (2000), 727 So. 2d 2 - Georgia Power Co. v. Partin (1998)

68 state decisions

380199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson · United States v. Alpert · McBro Planning and Development Company v. Triangle Electrical Construction Company Inc · Hughes Masonry Company, Inc. v. Greater Clark County School Building Corporation, J. A. Construction Management Corporation v. Insurance Company of North America, Third Party · Ex Parte Gates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must establish that the contracting parties intended, upon execution of the contract, to bestow a direct, as opposed to an incidental, benefit upon the third party.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “are founded on, and are intertwined with, the facts surrounding the underlying contract that contains the arbitration clause.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"A written provision in . . . a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract . . . or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract . . . shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.