709 So. 2d 46 - Jackson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"In every proceeding where there is at issue a dispute as to the custody of a child, a determination by the court that domestic or family violence has occurred raises a rebuttable presumption by the court that it is detrimental to the child and not in the best interest of the child to be placed in sole custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody with the perpetrator of domestic or family violence. Notwithstanding the provisions regarding rebuttable presumption, the judge must also take into account what, if any, impact the domestic violence had on the child."”

   8 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Emc v. Kcy · M.J.Y. v. J.S.Y.

2. “once a trial court determines that domestic or family violence has occurred, the court cannot consider awarding joint custody of a child to the perpetrator unless he or she has clearly rebutted the presumption against joint custody.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 721 So. 2d 224 - Harbert v. Harbert

3. “Custody and Domestic or Family Abuse Act,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 785 So. 2d 1147 - Nye v. Nye