Buehler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Helms v. State · Prochaska v. State · Kass v. State · Cleveland v. State · Bahlo v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Board may adopt such other reasonable rules as it may deem necessary with the respect to the eligibility of prisoners for parole and mandatory supervision ... or conditions to be imposed upon parolees and persons released to mandatory supervision_ The conditions shall include the making of restitution or reparation to the victim of the prisoner’s crime, in an amount not greater than such restitution or reparation as established by the court and entered in the sentence of the court which sentenced the prisoner to his term of imprisonment, and shall require reasonable progress toward restitution or reparation. The Board may include as a condition of parole that the prisoner pay any fine, cost, or fee, including a fee paid to a county-paid public defender or appointed counsel ... that is imposed on the prisoner in the prisoner’s sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gallegos v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.