¶1The practical effect of the order under review is to exclude the son Alexander from residence. In those circumstances, I think he is to all intents and purposes a party to the proceedings and, therefore, the issue of whether he has been unlawfully searched in violation of his constitutional rights is properly in the case.
71 A.D.2d 527
Tejada v. Christian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1979
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1979-12-20
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2009
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1979-12-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →