Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Ariz. 134 - Stamatis v. Johnson

Stamatis v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
9
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Davis v. Bruk (1980), Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co. (2001)

2 district · 26 state decisions

601950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 23 Cal. 2d 849 - Hannah v. Pogue · White Bros. v. Watson · Brown v. Bradbury · Beville v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reason for [the traditional] rule is that treating the location as variable would incite litigation and depreciate the value and discourage the improvement of the land upon which the easement is charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.