71 Cal. 2d 1021 - In Re Haro’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2005 · most notably 2 Cal. 3d 894 - People v. Williams (1970), 3 Cal. 3d 205 - In Re Cox (1970)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Carnley v. Cochran · Rice v. Olson · In Re Johnson · 67 Cal. 2d 444 - People v. Feggans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. Upon the consent of both client and attorney, filed with the clerk, or entered upon the minutes; “2. Upon the order of the court, upon the application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The record must show ... that an accused was offered counsel but intelligently and understandingly rejected the offer. Anything less is not waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.