71 Cal. 2d 1096 - People v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 500 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 547 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably 1 Cal. 3d 122 - In Re Tahl (1969), 6 Cal. 3d 441 - People v. Beagle (1972)
30 federal appellate · 500 state decisions — followed in 25 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · United States v. Wade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 547 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘We can readily ascribe many reasons why residents would not want their castaway clothing, letters, medicine bottles or other telltale refuse and trash to be examined by neighbors or others, at least not until the trash had lost its identity and meaning by becoming part of a large conglomeration of trash elsexchere. Half truths leading to rumor and gossip may readily flow from an attempt to “read” the contents of another’s trash.’ (Emphasis in original.) (Citations omitted.)”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“` whether the person has exhibited a reasonable expectation of privacy, and, if so, whether that expectation has been violated....'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses and other property, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.