Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 CAL2D 745 - People v. Redmond

People v. Redmond’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

630
cited by 630 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

624 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 630 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 2 Cal. 3d 118 - People v. Marsden (1970), 18 Cal. 4th 297 - People v. Bolin (1998)

624 state decisions

3400196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 62 Cal. 2d 692 - People v. Hillery · 40 Cal. 2d 876 - People v. Daugherty · 55 Cal. 2d 88 - People v. Robillard · 55 Cal. 2d 27 - People v. Sweeney · 69 Cal. 2d 122 - People v. Bassett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 630 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reversal on this ground is unwarranted unless it appears `that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support [the conviction].'”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]vidence which merely raises a strong suspicion of the defendant's guilt is not sufficient to support a conviction. Suspicion is not evidence; it merely raises a possibility, and this is not a sufficient basis for an inference of fact.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “appellate court must determine whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the prosecution sustained its burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.