Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 CUSTCT 112 - Knowles Electronics J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

Knowles Electronics J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 1984
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Robert Bosch Corp. v. United States · United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. · V. Alexander & Co. v. United States · Midland International Corp. v. United States · Humphreys v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “•X * -X X -X -X -X X Part 5 headnotes: 1. This part does not cover— •X * X -X ' -X -X -X X (vi) electrical instruments and apparatus * * * provided for in schedule 7. Generators, motors, motor-generators, converters (rotary or static), transformers, rectifiers and rectifying apparatus, and inductors; all the foregoing which are electrical goods, and parts thereof: # * * * * *X* X- .60 Other..................................... 12% ad val. •X X * * X X -X .70 Microphones; loudspeakers; headphones; audio-frequency electric amplifiers; ■ electric sound amplifier sets comprised of the foregoing components; and parts of the foregoing articles (including microphone stands)............. 15% ad val. •X X X X X X X X”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “10. General Interpretative Rules. For the purposes of these schedules— * -x- -X- * * * * * (ij) a provision for “parts” of an article covers a product solely or chiefly used as a part of such article, but does not prevail over a specific provision for such part. [Emphasis ours.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.