In re Gee Hop’s Empirical Analysis
71 F. 274 · 1895
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1973
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dynes v. Hoover · Domingo Urtetiqui v. John N D'Arcy · Withers v. Patterson · Murray v. American Surety Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The provisions of this title [Naturalization] shall apply to aliens being free white persons, and to aliens oí African nativity, and to persons of African descent.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Chinese laborers or Chinese of any other class, either permanently or temporarily residing in the United States, shall have for the protection of their persons and property all rights that are given by the laws of the United States to citizens of the most favored nation, excepting the right to become naturalized citizens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“hereafter no state court or court of the United States shall admit Chinese to citizenship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.