Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.1d 339 - Thompson v. Nelson

Thompson v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

71 F. 339 · 1895

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
December 1915
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1915

13 federal appellate ·

60189519001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur · Brown Manuf'g Co. v. Deere & Co. · Duplex Printing-Press Co. v. Campbell Printing-Press & Manuf'g Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The motion for a preliminary injunction necessarily involved the exercise by him of a sound judicial discretion in granting or withholding it. By no action of his could he enable this court finally to determine all the questions between the parties to the action, because it is not within the proper province of this court to do so on an appeal from an order granting a ijreliminary in-jitnction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.