Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 F.2d 342 - Hyman v. Helvering

Hyman v. Helvering’s Empirical Analysis

71 F.2d 342 · 1934

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
November 1970
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 1970 · most notably Wall v. United States (1947), Flanagan v. Helvering (1940)

32 federal appellate · 1 district ·

20019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 932

Relies on Commissioner v. Babson · Hellman v. Helvering · Hill v. Commissioner · Robinson v. Commissioner · In re Stookey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Definition of dividend. The term ‘dividend’ when used in this chapter (except in section 203 (a) (3) and section 207 (c) (1), relating to insurance companies) means any distribution made by a corporation to its shareholders, whether in money or in other property, (1) out of its earnings or profits accumulated after February 28, 1913, or (2) out of the earnings or profits of the taxable year (computed as of the close of the taxable year without diminution by reason of any distributions made during the taxable year), without regard to the amount of the earnings and profits at the time the distribution was made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Suppose * * * the case of two men holding practically the entire stock of a corporation for which each paid $50,000. The corporation, having accumulated a surplus of $50,000 above its cash capital, buys from the stockholders for cash one-half of the stock held by them and cancels it, and the payment is nontaxable because it is a partial redemption of stock. To change this result and make it taxable (g) was written and incorporated into the law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.